As promised, this is the second weekly installment of a series of posts in which we invite you to rip ads apart after we rip them out of magazines.
Pictured here, a two-page spread that appeared in the April 2006 issue of Electronic Gaming Monthly (click for a high-res image). There are actually several variations of this same ad in gaming magazines, but all of them feature Lara Croft's ample posterior, a bootylicious bundle of badonka-donk so large it serves as a friggin' grenade shelf. You might even say it's the bomb. At least that's the sort of salacious thinking that the ad invites.
What do you think of the ad? Does it succeed? Will it sell games? What does "seeing is believing" mean, exactly? Is it really all about the ass? Sure, we know that game quality ultimately sells games, so let's avoid talking about the quality of the game itself. What we want to get at here is whether this ad succeeds or fails to interest you in purchasing a copy of this game.
Gloves off! Go to!
[Update 1: fixed a small typo that nobody else noticed, but that bugged the heck out of me.]












(Page 1) Reader Comments
One giant leap for womens' groups everything, me thinks not.
Reply
Reply
Reply
go back to basics and be rid of the whole sexual appeal
only nature of the games, they wanted to prove that
its not just about T&A.
So if this advert is supposed to attract people that
enjoyed the originals and wanted a great game...it
fails completely.
but if it was just supposed to attract the generic
mainstream guys that just want the sex appeal, then
yeah, it succeeds.
Reply
Reply
The ad does a bang-up job of targetting half of the general population. As good as a Tomb Raider game gets, it's really Laura's assets that push units and the ad makes sure to rope in all the mouth-breathing oglers. Also, the addition of Laura's varied arsenal and backpack can only help to increase interest in the game's combat engine. After all, Laura's 'onion' is packin' heat and enough arsenal to take on a small militia.
BTW, I'm so happy she doesn't have a lower back tatoo.
Reply
But to give you a short answer: no, the ad does not want to make me buy the game. The demo that I downloaded on Xbox Live, however, was impressive and went quite a ways toward making me forget about the rehashed Tomb Raider garbage Eidos has shoveled into the world for the better part of the last decade. So yes, seeing really is believing.
I'd almost go so far to say that the demo made me want to buy the game, except I don't feel that it (or most other games for that matter) is worth $60 + tax. A lower price, however, might get my attention.
Reply
I downloaded the (600mb) demo on my 360 and i must say that i'm blown away by the visuals. The game is hard and wierd as ever with all its box-moving-trigger-tripping puzzles, but as soon as i get an extra 60 bucks, i'll be picking this one up.
Reply
Reply
You'd think that as an adventurer she might find the need to have pockets, but I guess not. Apparently the tiny backpack holds everything she needs.
And fawazr, nice point about the tattoo.
Reply
Reply
Let me explain :
On the ad, two textual elements "Seeing is believing" and "coming soon"
You can't see Lara Croft's face, only a part of her body. All you can guess is Lara is BIG, or she is very high (hence the size of her shadow).
The landscape is beautiful and detailed, but doesn't reveal anything about the game or the plot.
"Coming soon" means "We can't or won't show you anything about this new game".
But we can promise one thing - when you'll finally see it, you'll believe how great the game is (i.e. Seeing is believing.)
This game is great, and Lara is greater than ever befor (hence the size of the shadow.)
This ad tries to create an interest and a sense of curiosity in those who see it.
What's much more interesting, though, is that the only actual reference to the game is the internet domain name (www.tombraider.com, very small, and nearly invisible), but that everybody realizes it's a Tomb Raider ad.
I'm not a Lara Croft fan, and I think the games are boring. But I find this ad intriguing, and I am sure it created quite a buzz.
Reply
Reply
Reply
However since playing a demo of the original on the Saturn and finding the many and varied flaws (bad controls, awful camera, bad menu, running into walls)and reading every review for a TR game since where the same flaws are pointed out again and again is what (to this day) prevents me from buying them.
Maybe a little less work should be done on T&A and a little more on R&D.
Reply
Reply
You would also know that the only thing that is big on Lara are her cans. Huge ass my ass! Lara is so disproportionate to the side of Anorexia, that to suggest a "Beyonce booty" is laughable!
Reply
the ads are funny, i opened up my OXM this morning and the second ad that i saw, besides the first one being a MASSIVE shot of lara crofts face on my cover jacket, is another one like this jsut her shadow is plastered on a mayan temple.. . and my first thought, "attack of the 50ft lara ?" "hopefully it's better than angel of darkness"
but as to the ad .. . funny? .. . incites a chuckle .. . sexy? maybe .. . if you're into that virtual, half naked kinda stuff.. . but considering how the last tomb raider was (IMO) .. . i suppose they can only go up .. .
Reply
Second, no matter that you aren't 14 years old anymore - there's a whole NEW generation of gamers that ARE 14 years old, and to them, the scantilly clad Lara kicking butt and taking names is perfect.
Third, having an assortment of fragmentation grenades on your butt in this fashion, in addition to the two smoke grenades on the backpack, is a perfect invitation to accidental discharge. Can we get the safety clips on the rings, or has she purposely bent the cotter pins so that they can't be pulled out by snagging the rings on a passing branch?
And finally, seeing is believing. Remember how simplistic the graphics were when Lara premiered? (Of course not - you're not old enough. Ask your parents about the rudimentary graphics.) I think what this is trying to indicate is that they've used something similar to the Poser model for realism in body translation and 3D play, and that seeing it in action will make you believe that you're in the game. Personally, I'm waiting for the VR headsets like they have at some arcades and the reality gloves - THEN I'll believe I'm interacting in a 3D world.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The ad is much better than the lame Hitman ad though
Reply
Reply
Shouldn't they be focusing on her breasts or something?
Reply
Reply
All kidding aside, I think this gaming ad disucssion is great.
Let's be honest about this ad, it's not trying to sell the game on anything that makes a game a true success (story, playability, entertainment), instead it's marketing image over substance. It also has some bizzarly primal undertones with the image of a half naked woman looming over the amazon jungle. Is that necessary? I'm not sure. I certainly wouldn't be interested in the game based on this lazy, completely obvious sexual ploy.
I think that making female characters sexy is fine, but we're all grown up now and I think we can be more mature about the role of female characters in video games. Isn't the game about solving puzzles? Shouldn't the ad make you solve a puzzle of some kind? Maybe a picture of Laura doing Sudoku? I don't know, I guess that's why they don't pay me the big bucks.
Reply
Now that we have all contributed to this surprisingly bad blog, can we move on now?
Reply
Reply
The phrase "seeing is believing" leaves the consumer wondering how this game will vary from the other games in the series as well as the two terrible movies produced. Perhaps the phrase is getting at this game will be a sort of rebirth of the series perhaps where instead of focusing so much on T&A the developers will focus on game play and critical thinking. However after reading this disappointment of a number of readers here about how bad the demo actually is, my idea seems pretty much crap.
"coming soon" just makes the game more appealing because you can actually look forward to its release, whether that be in a few weeks or a few months.
Overall the ad does do what it sets out to do, get those who could potentially buy the game even more interested then they already are. The shortfall of this ad is that it isn't appealing to anyone other then fans and horny teenage boys.
Reply
Reply
i sometimes feel game creators miss that .. . that they don't care about the game playability, they just want to show off there new character model(s) with bigger lumps, in the back and in the front .. . and they lose track of what we play games for .. . for the game, for the story.. .
character models and graphics in general come second in my book .. . hell i still play alot of PS1, super nes, nes games because the stories are good .. . and there just fun .. . i play alot of whacky ps2 games (MR.Mosquito, KATAMARI DAMACY, guitarooman, etc.) cause there not heavy graphics and the developers focused on THE GAME, not their shiny new character model made from a million polygons for uber realism.. .
but all aside .. .
does it sell on sex? yes
does it sell on pre-teen and teen hormones? YES! guns and lumps are great .. . XD
does it give those boys an false image of woman? you bet .. .
if the game is half as good as it looks, i'll be .. . surprised .. . but i'm not really keeping my hopes up for that one .. .
Reply
Although from how the ad is with the whole "seeing is believing" line. They could be talking about her chest, like you get to see her butt for free, but you gotta pay $50 to get to see the real goods.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I would think that ad needed to show more than a big butt to sell a game though. IMO
Reply
Consider it like a teaser or promotional poster for a movie. Considering the character -- an attractive woman adventurer, of course she's going to have a certain aspect of sex appeal -- but what they didn't do is show her huge chest, put her in a suggestive pose, etc. I think that is way toned down and definitely would make me interested in looking into the game.
Reply
That aside, I think it's interesting how this ad almost de-emphasizes violence. Note the dark colors of her weapons, as opposed the the bright contrasts used to highlight the scenery and Ms. Croft's posterior. I'd almost think that they plan on minimizing the fight sequences in the game to emphasize exploring.
In that, I think it's an effective ad. That said, I don't see any reason why I'll suddenly start liking Tomb Raider, and won't pick it up.
Reply
http://www.joystiq.com/2006/03/06/lara-crofts-new-rival/
Reply
Reply
The only folks that this interests are prepubecent boys, like pretty much every Rumble Roses XX ad.
Reply
Why do you Americans refer to the arse as a mule? Always wondered that.
Reply
Reply
Just my opinion of course.
Reply
Brilliant, I kept the ad (but I never got a PS)
WIth the Lara ad, her ass really doesn't look that large, it's just drawn that way (to steal a line). By that I mean the perspectives and dimensions are off. It's not like she is bending over picking up an ammo clip or something.
Reply
Personally I see nothing suggestive about this ad at all. It's an image of Lara looking over a cliff at a forest. Thats it. There have been much more suggestive ads for previous games.
The Seeing is Beleiving bit, I feel, is in reference to franchises' bad rep after AoD, and is basically asking for gamers to give it a chance. The forest represents a return to form, actual raiding of tombs.
The large shadow, to me, represents the history an impact Ms Croft once had the industry.
Some of you guys need to get your minds out of the gutter.
Reply
If memory serves, buttock cleavage, in the standing position, doesn't part the individual buttocks completely from start to finish as the fabric's texture indicates. Also, the width of her left thigh at the gun strap matches the width of her waist at its skinniest. I doubt even Playboy could compete with those cartoony contortions.
The ad seems to convey that it wants the viewer to contemplate frottage with a cross between a soul train dancer and a muppet.
Reply
Reply
Guess where the weak point is.....
(anyways my above comment still stands, i just had to get that joke in.)
Reply
Reply
It's not for us.
People who care about the actual content of the game aren't going to be swayed by any ad that comes out. We already know the game is going to be out, we all know pretty much whether or not we're going to buy it, and if we don't, we'll play the demo or read reviews.
This ad is geared towards the(sadly, larger) demographic of people who will pay $60 based off an ad like this. If a market exists and you can sell your current product to that larger demographic, I don't see how that is outside of their rights to do so.
Reply